Ita.crob/24/2011 Of M/S Prakash Electric Company v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
12 Feb 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita.crob/24/2011 Of M/S Prakash Electric Company v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Feb 2015
Assessment year(s)
2000-01
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita.crob/24/2011 Of M/S Prakash Electric Company v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K L MANJUNATHAND
THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE S SUJATHA
ITA CROB. NO.24/2011
BETWEEN
M/S PRAKASH ELECTRIC COMPANY|OPP. POST OFFICE, AMBALAPADY,UDUPI
... CROSS-OBJBECTO
(BY SRI SHARATH, ADV. FOR SRI CHYTHANYAK K,ADV.)
AND
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
C.R.BUILDING, ATTAVARA,
MANGALORE.
2.THE INCOME TAX OFICKR
WARD I, UDUPI.|
—. RESPONDENTS
THIS I[TA.CROB [IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLIRULE 1 R/w ORDER XLI RULE 22 OF CPC, ARISING OUTOFORDERDATED|18/07/2007|IN.ITANO.179/BANG/2007, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR2000-01, PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BEPLEASED TO:
I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAWSIATED THEREIN,
ll. ALLOW THR CROSS OBJECTION FILED AGAINSTCERTAIN FINDINGS MADE BY THE ITAT, BANGALOREBENCH IN ITA NO.179/BANG/2007 DATED 18-07-2007,IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.|
THIS ITA CROB COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING,THIs DAY,MANJUNATA, J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JU DBiGMENT
The learned Counsel appearing for the cross-objector has filed a memo stating that the cross-objections|filedby|him.1snot.maintainable.Therefore, he submits that may be permitted to|withdraw the cross-objection.
2. He is permitted to withdraw the cross-
objections. Accordingly,thecross-objection1S|dismissed.
Sd/-|JUDGE
Sd/-|JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.