Ita.crob/6/2010 Of Bharat Hotels Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
02 Dec 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita.crob/6/2010 Of Bharat Hotels Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
02 Dec 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita.crob/6/2010 Of Bharat Hotels Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BRBNGALURU
Dated this the 2[nd]day of December, 2015
Present
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
CS
THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE S SUJATHA |
Income Tax Appeal CROB 6/2010 in ITA 393/2009
Between.
Bharat Hotels Limited|(Unit: Hotel, the Grand Ashok, Bangalore)Kumara Krupa, High GroundsBangaloreCross Objector
(By Sri Rupesh Jain for)sri Prashanth Kumar, Adv.)
And
1 Commissioner ot Income Tax.
TDS, HMT Bhavan, Ganganagar
Bangalore
2)Tax Recovery Officer (TDS)
Range 18, Bangalore
Respondents|
(By Sri K V Aravind, Adv.)
Cross Objection is filed under $.260-A of the Income|
Tax Act, 1961 read with O 41 R 22, CPC praying to allow|
2
the appeal and reverse the impugned order dated|2/.2.2009 in ITA 1084/Bang/2008, etc.
ITA Crob. |coming on for hearing this day,Vineet Saran!, delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
We have heard Sri Rupesh Jain, learned counsel|appearing with Sri Prashanth Kumar for the cross objector|/assessee as well as Sri K V Aravind, learned counsel forthe respondents / Revenue and have perused the record. |
Sri Rupesh Jain, learned counsel for the cross|objector has submitted that in view of ITA 1606/2010having been dismissed as having become infructuous, the|assessee does not wish to press this cross objection.
Accordingly, the Cross Objection is dismissed.
Qrt
Sd/-
Judge
Sd/-
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.