Itat/104/2024 Brajesh Narnolia v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1) Asansol
High Court
10 Jan 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Itat/104/2024 Brajesh Narnolia v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1) Asansol
Date of order
10 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itat/104/2024 Brajesh Narnolia v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1) Asansol, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In the light of the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn and the appellant is at liberty to prosecute the application filed under the settlement scheme.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
od 2
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE
ITAT/104/2024 BRAJESH NARNOLIA VS
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1) ASANSOL
BEFORE :
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM -A N D- HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA DATE : January 10, 2025.
Appearance :Mr. Farhan Ghaffar, Adv. Mr. Ankit Chaturbedy, Adv. Mr. S. Srivastava, Adv. …for appellant Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. …for respondent
The Court :- We have heard learned Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Amit Sharma, learned standing Counsel for respondent/revenue.
Learned Advocate appearing for the appellant has written instruction from his client vide letter dated 9.12.2024 requesting for withdrawing this appeal as the appellant has availed the benefit of the direct taxes under V.S.V.S. scheme.
In the light of the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn and the appellant is at liberty to prosecute the application filed under the settlement scheme.
The letter dated 9.12.2024 given by the appellant/assessee to the learned Advocate appearing for the appellant is kept on record.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.