Itat/237/2017 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-8, Kolkata
High Court
29 Nov 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Itat/237/2017 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-8, Kolkata
Date of order
29 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itat/237/2017 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-8, Kolkata, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD-10
ITAT/237/2017
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE
-Versus-
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-8, KOLKATA
Appearance:Mr. P. K. Bhowmick, Adv....for the respondent.
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
-And-
The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Date : 29[th] November, 2021.
The Court : This appeal by the assessee filed under
Section 260A of the Income Tax Act (the ‘Act’ in brevity) isdirected against the order dated 7[th] September, 2016 passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, A-Bench, Kolkata (the ‘Tribunal’)in ITA No.1295/Kol/2011 for the assessment year 2006-07.
On the last date of hearing, learned counsel appearingfor the appellant submitted that he was no longer appearing forthe appellant and we directed that the appellant be intimated thatthe appeal will be listed today.
Today the appellant has not made any alternativearrangement and none appears for the appellant. Thus, it appearsthat the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter.Therefore, the appeal (ITAT/237/2017) and the connectedapplication (IA NO.GA/1/2017) stand dismissed for default.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
A/s./skc.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.