Case LawHigh Court › Itat/59/2020 Of Principal Commissioner O...

Itat/59/2020 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax -17,Kolkata v. Subrata Banerjee

High Court 02 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Itat/59/2020 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax -17,Kolkata v. Subrata Banerjee
Date of order
02 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itat/59/2020 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax -17,Kolkata v. Subrata Banerjee, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

ITAT/59/2020IA No.GA/2/2020IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX-17, KOLKATA -Versus-SUBRATA BANERJEE Appearance:Ms. Sucharita Biswas, Adv.Mr. Ashok Bhowmik, Adv....for the appellant. Mr. Avra Mazumder, Adv.Sk. Md. Bilwal Hossain, Adv....for the respondent. BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM -And- The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA The Court : This appeal of the revenue filed underSection 260A of the Income Tax Act (the ‘Act’ in brevity) isdirected against the order dated 31[st] December, 2018 passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, A-Bench, Kolkata (the ‘Tribunal’)in ITA No.2275/Kol/2018 for the assessment year 2014-15. The revenue has raised the following substantial questions of law for consideration: “i)Whether on the prevailing facts and statutoryprovisions pertaining to the instant case the Tribunal wasjustified to delete the addition of Rs.3,26,63,032/- andRs.6,53,260.64 by setting aside the order of the Commissionerof Income Tax(Appeals)? ii)Whether explanation given by the assessee in respect of bogus shares transactions was satisfactory interms of the provisions under section 68 of the said Act? iii) Whether the assessee is entitled to get benefit under Section 10(38) of the said Act?” We have heard Ms. Sucharita Biswas, learned standingcounsel for the appellant revenue and Mr. Avra Mazumder, learnedcounsel for the respondent assessee. The learned counsel for the respondent assessee submittedthat the assessee has availed the benefit of Vivad Se BiswasScheme and Form No.3 has been issued to the assessee on 28[th]January, 2021.In the light of the above, the appeal stands disposed ofon the ground that the respondent assessee has availed the benefitof Vivad Se Biswas Scheme. Consequently, the substantialquestions of law are left open. The connected application also stands disposed of. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) S.Das/mg
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan