Itat/82/2015 Ia No:ga/1/2015 (Old No.:ga/1740/2015 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata - 2
High Court
05 May 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Itat/82/2015 Ia No:ga/1/2015 (Old No.:ga/1740/2015 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata - 2
Date of order
05 May 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itat/82/2015 Ia No:ga/1/2015 (Old No.:ga/1740/2015 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kolkata - 2, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the submission made by the learned Advocate for appellant,the appeal being ITAT/82/2015 stands dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD-3
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)ORIGINAL SIDE
ITAT/82/2015IA No:GA/1/2015 (Old No.:GA/1740/2015)VERSUSCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA - 2
STAR GRIHA PVT. LTD.
BEFORE :
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAMAndTHE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYADate : 5 MAY, 2022.
Appearance:-
Mrs. Swapna Das, Adv.
…for Appellant Mr. Prithu Dudheria, Adv.
… for respondent
The Court : It has been submitted by the learned Advocate appearing
for the appellant that the appellant does not want to press the instantappeal. Learned Advocate for the revenue is also present.
In view of the submission made by the learned Advocate for appellant,the appeal being ITAT/82/2015 stands dismissed as not pressed.
The application being GA/1/2015 (Old. No. GA/1740/2015) alsostands dismissed.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.