Itat/82/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax , Internationa Taxation v. Outotec Ovj
High Court
11 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Itat/82/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax , Internationa Taxation v. Outotec Ovj
Date of order
11 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itat/82/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax , Internationa Taxation v. Outotec Ovj, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal being ITAT 82 of 2018 stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD-5
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income tax) ORIGINAL SIDE
ITAT 82 of 2018 IA No.GA 1 of 2018 (Old No.GA 730 of 2018), GA 2 of 2018 (Old No.GA 732 of 2018)
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION AND TRANSFER PRICING -Versus- OUTOTEC OYJ
BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM AND The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 11[th] November, 2021.
Appearance: Mr. P.K. Bhowmik, Adv. Mr. A. Ganguly, Adv. …for the appellant. Ms. Nilanjana Banerjee Pal, Adv. …for the respondent.
Re.: IA No.GA 1 of 2018(Old No.GA 730 of 2018)
The Court: This application has been filed to condone the delay of 147 days in filing the instant appeal.
Heard learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant and learned counsel appearing for the respondent assessee.
We are satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. The delay in filing the instant appeal is condoned.
Re.: ITAT 82 of 2018
Heard Mr. Bhowmik, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondent assessee that the assessee has availed the benefit of the waiver scheme and the matter has been settled and the entire tax arrears has been remitted. To substantiate such submission, learned counsel has produced a copy of form 5 dated 03.07.2020.
The appellant Revenue does not dispute the above factual position.
Recording the said submission, the instant appeal stands closed and the substantial questions of law are left open.
The appeal being ITAT 82 of 2018 stands disposed of. The stay application, accordingly, stands disposed of.
(T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
Pkd/s.pal.
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.