Itl/104/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Neeraj Kumar Bajaj,Wardha
High Court
29 Mar 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Itl/104/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Neeraj Kumar Bajaj,Wardha
Date of order
29 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itl/104/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Neeraj Kumar Bajaj,Wardha, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: All these appeals are allowed to be withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS.104/03, 106/03, 112/03 & 114/03
Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders ofdirections and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.Anand Parchure, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr.Thakkar, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR & B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ.
DATED : 29TH MARCH, 2007.
P.C. :
1.In all these appeals, the issue raised is regarding interest under Section 244 (1-A) on refund of interest paid under Section 220(2) of the Act.
2.The issue raised in these appeals is squarely covered by the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Sandvik Asia Limited V/s. CIT reported in 280ITR 643in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.
3.In view of the above, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks liberty to withdraw these appeals. All these appeals are allowed to be withdrawn. Refund of Court Fee as per rules.
Judge
Judge.
agk/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.