Itl/124/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Nagpur v. M/S Afzal Cold Storage And Ice Factory, Nagpur
High Court
27 Apr 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Itl/124/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Nagpur v. M/S Afzal Cold Storage And Ice Factory, Nagpur
Date of order
27 Apr 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itl/124/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Nagpur v. M/S Afzal Cold Storage And Ice Factory, Nagpur, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
274itl124.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Income Tax Appeal No.124 of 2013
(The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Nagpur .vs. M/s. Afzal Cold Storage and Ice Factory,
Kalamna, Nagpur)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=Office notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Ordersor directions and Registrar’s orders.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Mr.Anand Parchure, Adv. for the appellant.
CORAM: B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & S.B.SHUKRE, JJ.DATE: 27.4.2015
DATE
Heard.
Mr.Anand Parchure, learned Counsel for the appellant points out that, consequent to the impugned order of remand, fresh assessment order is already passed and it is assailed by the assessee in the appeal before the C.I.T. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw instant Income Tax Appeal in terms of pursis bearing Stamp No.4538 of 2015 with further direction to the Registry to refund the Court fee as per law.
In view of the pursis filed and the request made, the present Income Tax Appeal is disposed of as 'infructuous' keeping all the contentions therein open and the Registry is directed to refund the Court fee as per law. Consequently, CAT No.4 of 2015 is also disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.