Itl/130/2017 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Nagpur v. Smt. Abha Satish Chaturvedi
High Court
21 Aug 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Itl/130/2017 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Nagpur v. Smt. Abha Satish Chaturvedi
Date of order
21 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itl/130/2017 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Nagpur v. Smt. Abha Satish Chaturvedi, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In the circumstances, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with direction to refund the court fees to the appellant.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1 ita130.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.130 OF 2017
[The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2 .vs. Smt. Abha Satish Chaturvedi]
…....................................................................................................................................................Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders
…..................................................................................................................................................................................................Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for Appellant.
..........
CORAM: P.N. DESHMUKH AND
MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : AUGUST 21
, 2018.
The learned counsel for appellant has filed pursis stamp no.10716/2018 dated 13.8.2018 praying for withdrawal of instant appeal contending that as per the directions issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.7.2018, no appeal is to be preferred when the subject matter is below Rs.50 Lacs. Subject matter in the appeal is to the extent of Rs.46,13,719/-.
In the circumstances, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with direction to refund the court fees to the appellant.
Gulande
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue