Itl/140/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. M/S Bhagyalakshimi Mishra Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Nanded
High Court
18 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Itl/140/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. M/S Bhagyalakshimi Mishra Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Nanded
Date of order
18 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itl/140/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. M/S Bhagyalakshimi Mishra Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Nanded, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1`
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Income Tax Appeal No. 140/2007The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. M/s Bhagyalakshimi Mishra Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Nanded
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's ordersCourt's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders.Orders.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : A.P. Lavande & R.V.More,JJ
DATE : 18.10.2007
Heard Mr. Anand Parchure, the learned counsel for the appellant.
Mr. Parchure, states that this appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax will lie before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court and only the Aurangabad Bench will have jurisdiction to deal with this appeal. Mr. Parchure, the learned counsel further states that the entire record of appeal be returned to the appellant and the appellant is ready to place xerox copy of the same for the purpose of record. Since the appeal will have to be filed before the Aurangabad Bench, we direct the registry to return memo of appeal with annexures to the appellant with permission to the appellant to keep on record the xerox copy of the same for the purpose of record.
The appeal is permitted to be withdrawn subject to
2`
the above directions. The appeal is disposed of.
Judge
Judge
patle
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.