Itl/2/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nagpur v. Vidarbha Cricket Association, Nagpur
High Court
12 Oct 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Itl/2/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nagpur v. Vidarbha Cricket Association, Nagpur
Date of order
12 Oct 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itl/2/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nagpur v. Vidarbha Cricket Association, Nagpur, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS.2/2014 & 96/2013.The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nagpur.
-VERSUS-Vidarbha Cricket Association, Nagpur.
Office notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Ordersor directions and Registrar’s orders.
CORAM: B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE: OCTOBER 12, 2015.
Shri A. Parchure, learned Counsel for the appellant and Shri Dewani, learned Counsel for respondent state that the matters are wrongly placed with a group of appeals i.e. Income Tax Appeal Nos. 37/2009 and other matters, in which a question revolves around the scope of Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. They state that these two appeals are governed by the order dated 06.10.2015, passed in Income Tax Appeal no. 23/2011 and other connected matters, and can be disposed of in terms of the said
2
1210itl2.14
order.
2.In view of the joint submission and in terms of order dated 06.10.2015 in Income Tax Appeal Nos. 23/2011 and other connected matters, with similar observations and liberty, we dispose of these two Appeals. No cost.
Rgd.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.