Itl/3/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv , Nagpur v. Shri Benigopal G. Pasari Nagpur
High Court
02 Aug 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Itl/3/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv , Nagpur v. Shri Benigopal G. Pasari Nagpur
Date of order
02 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itl/3/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv , Nagpur v. Shri Benigopal G. Pasari Nagpur, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Parchure and in view of the above-referred Circular, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and consequently the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. sahare 2 3.Registrar (J) of this Court to refund the court fees to the appellant, if permissible under the Rules.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT NAGPURINCOME TAX APPEL NO: 3/2006(Commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. Shri Benigopal G. Pasari Nagpur)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coramappearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judges Order
.............................................................................................................................................................
Mr.Anand Parchure, Adv.for appellant
CORAM: A.P.LAVANDE & R.V.MORE, JJ. DATED: 2 nd August, 2007.
***
1.Mr. Parchure, learned counsel for the appellant states that tax effect involved in the present Appeal is less than Rs. 4 lakhs and seeks leave to withdraw the appeal in view of Circular dated 5[th] June, 2007 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes, New
Delhi.
2.In view of the statement made by Mr.
Parchure and in view of the above-referred Circular, the
appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and consequently the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
sahare
2
3.Registrar (J) of this Court to refund the
court fees to the appellant, if permissible under the Rules.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue