Case Law › High Court › Itl/32/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Itl/32/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Nag v. M/S. Mahindra Kumar Vasantlal And Sons Amt

High Court 20 Mar 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

20 Mar 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Itl/32/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Nag v. M/S. Mahindra Kumar Vasantlal And Sons Amt, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Income Tax Appeal No.32 of 2002 ( Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Nagpur .vs. M/s Mahinderkumar Vasantlaland Sons , Amravati ) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directionsCourt's or Judge's orders.and Registrar's orders ======================================= .......... CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE & P.D. KODE, JJ.DATED : MARCH 20, 2009 Heard Mr. Anand Jaiswal, Advocate for theappellant. The issue raised in the present appeal is squarelycovered by judgments of this Court in (1) Commissioner ofIncome Tax .vs. Associated Cement & Steel Agencies(1984) 147 ITR 776 (Bom), (2) Madhav Motors Stores.vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (1978) 115 ITR 887(Bom) and (3) Commissioner of Income Tax .vs.Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (2008)301 ITR 191 (Bom)against the revenue. Hence the appealis rejected. halwai JUDGE JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.