Case LawHigh Court › Itr Page 42 (Associated Capsules P. Ltd...

Itr Page 42 (Associated Capsules P. Ltd v. Deputy

High Court 17 Jan 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itr Page 42 (Associated Capsules P. Ltd v. Deputy
Date of order
17 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itr Page 42 (Associated Capsules P. Ltd v. Deputy, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal.

Decision: 4)The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ASN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2009 OF 2011 ACG Associated Capsules Private Limited...Appellant.v.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax...Respondent. ..Respondent. Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Appellant. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 17TH JANUARY, 2013 PC: In this appeal for assessment year 2002-03 the appellant-assessee has formulated the following question of law for consideration by this Court. Whether the profits eligible for deduction under section 80HHC of the Act can be reduced by the amount of deduction allowed under section 80-IB of the Act? ASN2/2 2)The Advocates for the appellant as well as the respondent state that the aforesaid question stands concluded by the decision of this Court in assessee's own case reported in 332 ITR Page 42 (Associated Capsules P. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and another). 3)In view of the decision in appellant-assessee's own case (supra) the question of law as framed is answered in the negative in favour of the assessee and against the respondent- revenue. 4)The appeal is disposed of in the above terms. (M.S.SANKELCHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan