In Itr Page 42 (Associated Capsules P. Ltd v. Deputy, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal.
Decision: 4)The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ASN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2009 OF 2011
ACG Associated Capsules Private Limited...Appellant.v.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax...Respondent.
..Respondent.
Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Appellant.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 17TH JANUARY, 2013
PC:
In this appeal for assessment year 2002-03 the
appellant-assessee has formulated the following question of law for consideration by this Court.
Whether the profits eligible for deduction under section 80HHC of the Act can be reduced by the amount of deduction allowed under section 80-IB of the Act?
ASN2/2
2)The Advocates for the appellant as well as the
respondent state that the aforesaid question stands concluded by
the decision of this Court in assessee's own case reported in 332
ITR Page 42 (Associated Capsules P. Ltd. v. Deputy
Commissioner of Income Tax and another).
3)In view of the decision in appellant-assessee's own
case (supra) the question of law as framed is answered in the
negative in favour of the assessee and against the respondent-
revenue.
4)The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.
(M.S.SANKELCHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.