Itr/101/1999 Of The Commissioner Oc Incometax v. S.manju
High Court
24 Jun 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Itr/101/1999 Of The Commissioner Oc Incometax v. S.manju
Date of order
24 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itr/101/1999 Of The Commissioner Oc Incometax v. S.manju, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: The question raised in these reference cases is whether the item of property gifted by father of the respondent-assessee to her can be assessedfor wealth tax or not.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
TUESDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2008 / 3RD ASHADHA 1930
ITR.No. 101 of 1999()
---------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER IN RA 152/COCH/98 IN
WTA.44/COCH//1993 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPLICANT:
-----------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL,GOI(TAXES)
RESPONDENTS:
-------------
SMT.S.MANJU, SUNDARA BHAVANAM,ASRAMOM, QUILON.
BY ADV. SRI.C.KOCHUNNY NAIR
SRI.DALE P.KURIEN
THIS TAX REFERENCE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 24/06/2008, ALONG WITH ITR NO. 102 OF 1999 &
ITR NO.103 OF 1999, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K.MOHANAN, JJ.
....................................................................
I.T.R. Nos.101 to 103 of 1999
....................................................................Dated this the 24th day of June, 2008.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
The question raised in these reference cases is whether the item of
property gifted by father of the respondent-assessee to her can be assessedfor wealth tax or not. The property happened to be assessed for wealth taxin the hands of the respondent on account of the department's stand that gifthas taken effect leading to transfer of property from the donor to therespondent-donee. However, Tribunal allowed assessee's appeal becausethe gift tax assessment was cancelled by the Tribunal holding that propertyremains with the father. Standing Counsel submitted that appeal is filedagainst order of the Tribunal pertaining to gift tax assessment. Since thequestion essentially has to be decided in appeal, if any, pending against gifttax assessment cancelled by the Tribunal, we close these I.T.Rs. bydeclining to answer the questions referred, but with a direction to theAssessing Officer to revise the assessments in line with the gift tax
assessments after this court disposes of the gift tax appeals stated to bepending.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
pms
V.K.MOHANANJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.