Itr/109/1999 Of M/S.hotel Panchavati Nashik v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Nashik
High Court
29 Aug 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itr/109/1999 Of M/S.hotel Panchavati Nashik v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Nashik
Date of order
29 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itr/109/1999 Of M/S.hotel Panchavati Nashik v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Nashik, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: 4.The Reference is disposed of in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
No R&P
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 109 OF 1999
M/s. Hotel Panchavati, Nashik .. Applicant
v/s.
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik .. Respondent
Mr. Neelabh Shreesh i/b Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar for the applicant None for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & S.C. GUPTE, J.J.
DATED : 29[th] AUGUST, 2016.
P.C.
1.Mr. Shreesh, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant assessee states that inspite of best efforts, he is unable to obtain any instructions from the applicant assessee to support the present Reference.
2.Therefore, it appears that the applicant assessee is not interested in pursuing the present Reference.
3.In the aforesaid circumstances, the Reference is returned
unanswered. However, the questions as framed for our opinion in this Reference are left open to be considered in an appropriate case, if not already decided.
4.The Reference is disposed of in the above terms. No order as to costs.
(S.C. GUPTE, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.