Itr/1/2004 Of The Commr.of Income Tax,Trivandrum v. Shri.a.m.moosa,Chandiroor,Alleppey
High Court
25 Nov 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Itr/1/2004 Of The Commr.of Income Tax,Trivandrum v. Shri.a.m.moosa,Chandiroor,Alleppey
Date of order
25 Nov 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itr/1/2004 Of The Commr.of Income Tax,Trivandrum v. Shri.a.m.moosa,Chandiroor,Alleppey, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Issue: The question raised in the reference made at the instance of therevenue is whether the items of income referred to in paragraph 2 of thereference should be reckoned while computing eligible exemption ofexport profit under Section 80HHC of the I.T.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID
TUESDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1930
ITR.No. 1 of 2004()
-------------------
ITA.801/COCH/1992 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPLICANT(S):
--------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADV. SRI. P.K. R MENON, SR. COUNSEL
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
SHRI. A.M. MOOSA, C/O. M/S. BHARAT SEA FOODS,
CHANDIROOR, ALLEPPEY
BY ADV.
THIS TAX REFERENCE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 25/11/2008 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ.
--------------------------------------------
M.A.C.A. No. 1 OF 2004
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 25th day of November, 2008
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair,J.
The question raised in the reference made at the instance of therevenue is whether the items of income referred to in paragraph 2 of thereference should be reckoned while computing eligible exemption ofexport profit under Section 80HHC of the I.T. Act. We have heardcounsel appearing for the revenue and have gone through the order ofthe Tribunal. We find that out of 8 items referred to in paragraph 2 ofthe reference order, disallowance is called for in respect of ice sales forRs. 45,507/-, freezing and cold storage charges of Rs. 1,04,482/-,profit on sale of vehicles of Rs. 19,656/- and interest on investmentsbeing only paltry sum of Rs. 537/-. All other items qualify to beconsidered in the computation of eligible export profits. We thereforedispose of the reference by answering the question substantially infavour of the assessee as stated above and balance in favour of the
revenue as stated above.
A copy of this judgment under the seal of the High Court andsignature of the Registrar-General shall be forwarded to the Income taxAppellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench, for modification of their orderconsistent with the above decision.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.
(HARUN-UL-RASHID)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.