Itr/1/2006 Of M/S.best Wood Industries & Saw Mills v. The Commr.of Income Tax,Cochin
High Court
09 Dec 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Itr/1/2006 Of M/S.best Wood Industries & Saw Mills v. The Commr.of Income Tax,Cochin
Date of order
09 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itr/1/2006 Of M/S.best Wood Industries & Saw Mills v. The Commr.of Income Tax,Cochin, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Reference Case is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2009 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1931
ITR.No. 1 of 2006()
-------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER IN RA. NO. 306/COCH/1997 IN
ITA.127/COCH/1995 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPLICANT(S): APPLICANT
-----------------------
M/S.BEST WOOD INDUSTRIES & SAW MILLS
PATTIMATTOM, KIZHAKKAMBALAM.
BY ADV. SRI. K.MV. PANDALAI &
SMT. HEMALATHA
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT
-------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, COCHIN.
ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI. JOSE JOSEPH
THIS TAX REFERENCE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 09/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K. MOHANAN, JJ.
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 9th day of December, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Heard counsel appearing for the assessee and standing counselfor the respondent. Even though the matter is referred to this Court bythe Tribunal based on judgment of this Court, after hearing in detailcounsel for the assessee and after going through the Tribunal's order,we find that the questions raised are on pure findings on facts by theTribunal pertaining to assessee's challenge against rejection of traderesults, estimation of gross profit and specified additions fordiscrepancies in the accounts. Since no question referred is substantialquestion of law arising from the order of the Tribunal, we decline toanswer the questions. Reference Case is disposed of as above.
Registry will forward a copy of this judgment under the seal ofthe High Court and signature of the Registrar-General to the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench, Cochin, for closing the matter.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.
(V.K. MOHANAN)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.