Case LawHigh Court › Itr/1/2006 Of M/S.best Wood Industries &...

Itr/1/2006 Of M/S.best Wood Industries & Saw Mills v. The Commr.of Income Tax,Cochin

High Court 09 Dec 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Itr/1/2006 Of M/S.best Wood Industries & Saw Mills v. The Commr.of Income Tax,Cochin
Date of order
09 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itr/1/2006 Of M/S.best Wood Industries & Saw Mills v. The Commr.of Income Tax,Cochin, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Decision: Reference Case is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2009 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 ITR.No. 1 of 2006() ------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN RA. NO. 306/COCH/1997 IN ITA.127/COCH/1995 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPLICANT(S): APPLICANT ----------------------- M/S.BEST WOOD INDUSTRIES & SAW MILLS PATTIMATTOM, KIZHAKKAMBALAM. BY ADV. SRI. K.MV. PANDALAI & SMT. HEMALATHA RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, COCHIN. ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI. JOSE JOSEPH THIS TAX REFERENCE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K. MOHANAN, JJ. -------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of December, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Heard counsel appearing for the assessee and standing counselfor the respondent. Even though the matter is referred to this Court bythe Tribunal based on judgment of this Court, after hearing in detailcounsel for the assessee and after going through the Tribunal's order,we find that the questions raised are on pure findings on facts by theTribunal pertaining to assessee's challenge against rejection of traderesults, estimation of gross profit and specified additions fordiscrepancies in the accounts. Since no question referred is substantialquestion of law arising from the order of the Tribunal, we decline toanswer the questions. Reference Case is disposed of as above. Registry will forward a copy of this judgment under the seal ofthe High Court and signature of the Registrar-General to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench, Cochin, for closing the matter. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge. (V.K. MOHANAN) Judge. kk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan