Itr/1/2008 Of M/S.upasana Hospital & Nursing Home v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tvm
High Court
27 Feb 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Itr/1/2008 Of M/S.upasana Hospital & Nursing Home v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tvm
Date of order
27 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itr/1/2008 Of M/S.upasana Hospital & Nursing Home v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tvm, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: We do not find any substantial question of law arising fromthe orders of Tribunal in a matter where the dispute is only on the quantumof addition sustained.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
FRIDAY, THE 27TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 8TH PHALGUNA 1930
ITR.No. 1 of 2008()
-------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA.513/COCH/1992 IN
RA.225/COCH/1995 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPLICANT:
-------------
M/S.UPASANA HOSPITAL & NURSING HOME,
QUILON.
RESPONDENT:
----------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,
TRIVANDRUM.
ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS TAX REFERENCE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 27/02/2009, ALONG WITH ITR NOS.2/08 & 3/08, THE COURT ON
THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I.T.R. Nos. 1, 2 & 3 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dated this the 27[th] day of February, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair,J.
The Tribunal has referred these cases pertaining to the assessmentyears 1983-84, 1984-85 and 1985-86 at the instance of the assessee. Inspite of service of notice, the assessee has not entered appearance incourt. Therefore, we have gone through the orders and proceed to disposeof the reference cases.
2. On going through the reference order itself, we find that thequestion raised pertains to addition of unexplained investments in the formof purchase of hospital equipments valuing Rs.4,89,948/-. Assessee'scase is that as against this amount addition to be sustained is onlyRs.62,046/-. We do not find any substantial question of law arising fromthe orders of Tribunal in a matter where the dispute is only on the quantumof addition sustained. We, therefore, dispose of the reference order bydeclining to answer the question referred.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.
(K. SURENDRA MOHAN)
Judge.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.