Case LawHigh Court › Itr/12/2002 Of Smt.t.c.usha,Kollam v. Th...

Itr/12/2002 Of Smt.t.c.usha,Kollam v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tvm

High Court 10 Feb 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Itr/12/2002 Of Smt.t.c.usha,Kollam v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tvm
Date of order
10 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itr/12/2002 Of Smt.t.c.usha,Kollam v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tvm, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 21ST MAGHA,1942 ITR.No.12 OF 2002 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN RA 145(Coch)/1998 OFI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH PETITIONER/APPLICANT: SMT.T.C.USHA,NANI NIVAS, KOCHUPILAMOODU KOLLAM RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON, SR.COUNSEL FOR ITR1 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC, FOR IT THIS INCOME TAX REFERENCE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON10.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: I.T.R. No.12/02 ORDER Dated this the 10[th] day of February, 2021 S.V.Bhatti, J. Read order dated 25.9.2017. No representation for the petitioner/applicant. We declineto answer the reference of Tribunal dated 29.10.2002. However,liberty is granted to the petitioner/applicant to file a petition inaccordance with law, if circumstances warrant and if causesurvives to revive I.T.Revision. The revision petition is disposedof. Despatch a copy of the order to the Tribunal. Sd/- S.V.BHATTI JUDGE Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE vps /True Copy/ PS to Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan