Case LawHigh Court › Itr/126/2000 Of Shri Ratan H. Khatri And...

Itr/126/2000 Of Shri Ratan H. Khatri And Ors v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai City-I

High Court 02 Sep 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itr/126/2000 Of Shri Ratan H. Khatri And Ors v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai City-I
Date of order
02 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
1985-86
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itr/126/2000 Of Shri Ratan H. Khatri And Ors v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai City-I, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: 4.The Reference is disposed of in the above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.126 OF 2000 Ratan H. Khatri .. Applicant v/s. The Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai City-I, Mumbai .. Respondent None for the applicantNone for the respondent P.C. CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & S.C. GUPTE, J.J. DATED : 2[nd] SEPTEMBER, 2016. 1.This Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been made by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal at the instance of the applicant Revenue for A.Y. 1985-86. 2.None appears on behalf of the applicant assessee. It appears that the applicant assessee is not interested in pursuing the present Reference. 3.In the above view, the Reference is returned unanswered. 4.The Reference is disposed of in the above terms. No order as to costs. (S.C. GUPTE, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan