Itr v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Kolhapur
High Court
02 Sep 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itr v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Kolhapur
Date of order
02 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
1990-91
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itr v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Kolhapur, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: 5.The Reference is disposed of in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.127 OF 2000
Parner Taluka Sahakari Sakhar KarkhanaLtd.
.. Applicant
v/s. The Commissioner of Income Tax,Kolhapur .. Respondent
Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar a/w Mr. Ruturaj Gurjar i/b S.N. Inamdar for the applicant None for the respondent
P.C.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & S.C. GUPTE, J.J.
DATED : 2[nd] SEPTEMBER, 2016.
1.This Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal relates to Assessment Year 1990-91.
2.Mr. Naniwadekar, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant assessee is unable to show any evidence of service of this Reference upon the respondent Revenue. In view of Rule 658 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980, it is the obligation of the party at whose instance Reference has been made to have a notice issued and served upon the opposite party within two months from the receipt of
the Reference in the High Court by the Prothonotary and Senior Master.
3.In the above view, it appears that the applicant assessee is not serious about pursuing the present Reference.
4.Accordingly, the Reference is returned unanswered. However,
the questions as framed for our opinion in this Reference are left open
to be considered in an appropriate case, if not already decided.
5.The Reference is disposed of in the above terms. No order as to costs.
(S.C. GUPTE, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.