Itr/146/1990 Of M/S.hindustan Ferodo Ltd.bombay v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bombay City Vi, Bombay
High Court
12 Jan 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itr/146/1990 Of M/S.hindustan Ferodo Ltd.bombay v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bombay City Vi, Bombay
Date of order
12 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itr/146/1990 Of M/S.hindustan Ferodo Ltd.bombay v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bombay City Vi, Bombay, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.146 OF 1990M/s. Hindustan Ferodo Ltd.,L.B.S. Marg, Bombay-400086....Applicant.Vs.The Commissioner of Income Tax,Bombay City VI, Bombay....Respondent.
Mr. Jitendra Jain with Mr. H.K.Sudhakara i/by Khaitan & Co.for the Applicant.
Mr. J.S. Saluja with Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 12TH JANUARY, 2009.
ORAL JUDGMENT :( Per R.S. Mohite, J.)
(a) Export Certification fees Rs. 4,400.00
(b) Foreign charges on goods
exported
Rs. 80,609.00
(c) Packing materials on goods
(d) Discounting and other bank
charges of export documentation
for opening L/C etc.Rs. 6,566.00(e) Difference in exchange onremittance receivedRs. 12,852.00
do not qualify for weighted deduction under section
35B of the Income Tax Act?
thereof. We therefore, proceed to answer the aforesaid
questions as follows.
inspection charges. Being in agreement, we answer this
question in the affirmative and against the assessee.
Act. Being in agreement, we answer this question in the
affirmative and against the assessee.
eligible to a weighted deduction in view of specificexclusion made in sub clause (iii) of Section 35B(1)(b) of
the Income Tax Act,1961. Being in agreement, we answer this
question in the affirmative and against the assessee.
agreement, we answer this question in the affirmative and
against the assessee.
11. In the net result, the reference is answered in the
aforesaid terms and stands disposed off with no order as to
costs.
( R.S. MOHITE, J.)
( F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.