Itr/16/2001 Of Keswani Synthetics Industries Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-I
High Court
17 Jan 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itr/16/2001 Of Keswani Synthetics Industries Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-I
Date of order
17 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itr/16/2001 Of Keswani Synthetics Industries Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-I, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.Reference is disposed of in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 16 OF 2001
Keswani Synthetics Industries Ltd.
… Applicant
VersusThe Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City-I, Mumbai.
…Respondent
None for the Applicant.
Mr. A.R. Malhotra, i/b Prakash C. Chhotaray for the Respondent.
PC:-
CORAM:
DATED:
M.S.SANKLECHA, &MR. RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.17TH JANUARY 2018
1.This Reference at the instance of the Assessee was on board on 6th July 2017. However, as none appeared for the Applicant in support of the Reference, the Reference was adjourned to 27th July 2017. Thereafter, this Reference was on board yesterday, at that time also none appeared for the Applicant in support of the Reference. Therefore, this Reference was kept today under the caption for dismissal. Today also none appears on behalf of the Applicant in support of the Reference. It appears that Applicant is not interested in prosecuting this Reference.
2.Accordingly, the Reference returned unanswered.
3.Reference is disposed of in the above terms.
( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. )
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue