Case LawHigh Court › Itr/190/1999 Of M/S Zenith Ltd v. The Co...

Itr/190/1999 Of M/S Zenith Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 05 Aug 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itr/190/1999 Of M/S Zenith Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
05 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
1980-81
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itr/190/1999 Of M/S Zenith Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: 4.The Reference is disposed of in the above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 190 OF 1999 M/s. Zenith Ltd. v/s. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-I, Bombay .. Applicant .. Respondent Ms. A. Vissanji for the applicant None for the respondent P.C. CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J. DATED : 5[th] AUGUST, 2016. 1.This Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) relates to Assessment Year 1980-81. 2.Ms. Vissanji, learned Counsel appearing in support of the applicant assessee states that she has been instructed not to press the present Reference. 3.In the circumstances, the Reference is being returned unanswered. However, the questions as framed for our opinion in this Reference are left open to be considered in an appropriate case, if not already decided. 4.The Reference is disposed of in the above terms. No order as to costs. (A.K. MENON, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan