Case LawHigh Court › Itr/191/1994 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Itr/191/1994 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrinalini V Sarabhai Trust

High Court 11 Jul 1996 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Itr/191/1994 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrinalini V Sarabhai Trust
Date of order
11 Jul 1996
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itr/191/1994 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrinalini V Sarabhai Trust, the High Court (1996) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge ? --------------------------------------------------------- Appearance : Mr Manish Bhatt, Advocate for the Applicant.

Decision: This reference is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 191 OF 1994 For Approval of Signature : Hon'ble MR. JUSTICE B.C. PATEL and �MR. JUSTICE R.R. JAIN --------------------------------------------------------- 1.�Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed �to see the judgments ? 2. To be referred to the Report or not ? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any Order made thereunder ? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge ? --------------------------------------------------------- Appearance : Mr Manish Bhatt, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr R K Patel, Advocate for the Respondent. --------------------------------------------------------- Coram : B.C. Patel & R.R. Jain, JJ. Date of Decision : 11th July, 1996 Oral Judgment : (Per B.C. Patel, J.) �At the instance of Revenue, the following question has been referred to this Court under Sec. 256 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). "Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that there was no trasfer in the present case and therefore, there was no taxable capital gains ?" 2.�We have heard the counsels for both the parties. In view of the decision of this Court reported in 120 CTR 300, this question need not to be answered. This reference is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan