In Itr/206/1995 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrunalinidevi Puar Of Dhar, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2For the reasons recorded in judgment of even date rendered in Income Reference No.229 of 1995 between the same parties this Reference is also returned unanswered and stands disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 206 of 1995
For Approval and Signature:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED
=====================================================
1 [Whether Reporters of Local Papers may ]be allowed to see the judgment ?be allowed to see the judgment ?
2 [To be referred to the Reporter or not ]??
3 [Whether their Lordships wish to see ]the fair copy of the judgment ?the fair copy of the judgment ?
Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the 4interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?
5 [Whether it is to be circulated to the ]civil judge ?civil judge ?
=====================================================
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - Applicant(s)Versus
MRUNALINIDEVI PUAR OF DHAR - Respondent(s)
Appearance :MR BB NAIK for Applicant(s) : 1.NOTICE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 1.=====================================================
CORAM :HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTAand
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYEDDate : 06/02/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA)
1This Reference at the instance of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhopal (M.P.) raises identical three questions of law as raised in Income
Tax Reference No. 229 of 1995. The only
distinguishing feature being the Assessment Year, which is 1983-84. In the circumstances, it is not necessary to set out the facts and contentions in detail.
2For the reasons recorded in judgment of even date rendered in Income Reference No.229 of 1995 between the same parties this Reference is also returned unanswered and stands disposed of accordingly.
(D.A. Mehta, J.)
(Z.K. Saiyed, J.)
M.M.BHATT
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.