Case LawHigh Court › Itr/206/1995 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Itr/206/1995 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrunalinidevi Puar Of Dhar

High Court 06 Feb 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Itr/206/1995 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrunalinidevi Puar Of Dhar
Date of order
06 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itr/206/1995 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mrunalinidevi Puar Of Dhar, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2For the reasons recorded in judgment of even date rendered in Income Reference No.229 of 1995 between the same parties this Reference is also returned unanswered and stands disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 206 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED ===================================================== 1 [Whether Reporters of Local Papers may ]be allowed to see the judgment ?be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 [To be referred to the Reporter or not ]?? 3 [Whether their Lordships wish to see ]the fair copy of the judgment ?the fair copy of the judgment ? Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the 4interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 [Whether it is to be circulated to the ]civil judge ?civil judge ? ===================================================== COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - Applicant(s)Versus MRUNALINIDEVI PUAR OF DHAR - Respondent(s) Appearance :MR BB NAIK for Applicant(s) : 1.NOTICE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 1.===================================================== CORAM :HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTAand HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYEDDate : 06/02/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA) 1This Reference at the instance of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhopal (M.P.) raises identical three questions of law as raised in Income Tax Reference No. 229 of 1995. The only distinguishing feature being the Assessment Year, which is 1983-84. In the circumstances, it is not necessary to set out the facts and contentions in detail. 2For the reasons recorded in judgment of even date rendered in Income Reference No.229 of 1995 between the same parties this Reference is also returned unanswered and stands disposed of accordingly. (D.A. Mehta, J.) (Z.K. Saiyed, J.) M.M.BHATT
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan