Itr/223/1999 Of Tata Export Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
10 Aug 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itr/223/1999 Of Tata Export Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
10 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
1979-80
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itr/223/1999 Of Tata Export Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: 4.Reference is disposed of in above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
SbwIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.223 OF 1999
Tata Exports Ltd...ApplicantVersusThe Commissioner of Income-TaxBombay, City-I, Bombay...Respondent
...........
Mr. Firoz Andhyarujina, Senior Counsel, a/w Sameer Dalal for the applicant.Mr. Suresh Kumar a/w Ms. Samiksha Kanani for the respondent.
...........
CORAM: M. S. SANKLECHA & A. K. MENON, JJ.
P.C.:
DATE : 10[th] AUGUST, 2016
This Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is
in respect of A.Y. 1979-80.
2.Mr. Andhyarujina, the learned Senior Counsel, appearing in support of the applicant-assessee states that he has instructions not to press the present Reference.
3.In view of the fact that the applicant-assessee is not interested in pursuing the Reference made at its instance, we return the Reference unanswered. However, it is made clear that the question of law raised herein is left open for consideration in an appropriate case, if not already decided.
4.Reference is disposed of in above terms. No order as to costs.
(A. K. MENON, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.