Itr/293/1995 Of K.c. Patel v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
22 Dec 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Itr/293/1995 Of K.c. Patel v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
22 Dec 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itr/293/1995 Of K.c. Patel v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Issue: 3 [Whether their Lordships wish to see ]the fair copy of the judgment ?Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to 4the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?5 [Whether it is to be circulated to ]the civil judge ? =========================...
Decision: The Reference stands disposed of accordingly, with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADINCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 293 of 1995
For Approval and Signature:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Sd/-
HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI Sd/-
================================================
Whether Reporters of Local Papers 1may be allowed to see the judgment ?
2 [To be referred to the Reporter or ]not ?
3 [Whether their Lordships wish to see ]the fair copy of the judgment ?Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to 4the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?5 [Whether it is to be circulated to ]the civil judge ?
================================================
K.C. PATEL - Applicant(s)
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - Respondent(s)
=================================================
Appearance :
MR RK PATEL for Applicant(s) : 1,MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent(s) : 1,=================================================
ITR/293/1995
2/2
CORAM :HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTAandHONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI
Date : 22/12/2005
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI)
1 Mr.B.D.Karia, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant-assessee states, under instructions, that he does not press the present Reference.
2
In the circumstances, the Reference is left
unanswered. The Reference stands disposed of accordingly, with no order as to costs.
Sd/-
Sd/-
(D.A.Mehta,J) (H.N.Devani, J)
m.m.bhatt
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.