Itr/376/1984 Of Commissioner Of Income -Tax v. Bakubhai Mansukhbhai Charity Trust
High Court
26 Jul 1996 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Itr/376/1984 Of Commissioner Of Income -Tax v. Bakubhai Mansukhbhai Charity Trust
Date of order
26 Jul 1996
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itr/376/1984 Of Commissioner Of Income -Tax v. Bakubhai Mansukhbhai Charity Trust, the High Court (1996) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 376 OF 1984
For Approval of Signature :
Hon'ble MR. JUSTICE B.C. PATEL and Sd/-
�MR. JUSTICE R.R. JAIN�Sd/-
---------------------------------------------------------
1.�Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
�to see the judgments ? No
2. To be referred to the Report or not ? No
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgment ? No
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the
Constitution of India, 1950 or any Order made
thereunder ? No
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil
Judge ? No
---------------------------------------------------------
Appearance :
Mr B.J. Shelat for M/s R.P Bhatt & Co., for the
Applicant.
Mr D.A. Mehta, Mr R.K. Patel and Mr B.D. Karia, Advocates
for the Respondent.
---------------------------------------------------------
Coram : B.C. Patel & R.R. Jain, JJ.
Date of Decision : 26th July, 1996
Oral Judgment : (Per B.C. Patel, J.)
�The Tribunal has referred the following questions
for opinion of this Court.
"1.�Whether, on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the assessee was
entitled to claim exemption u/s. 11 of the I.T.
Act, 1961 in respect of the contribution of Rs.
80,000/- made to Nirmala Bakubhai Foundation ?"
2.�Whether, on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right
in holding that the interest received by the
assessee on fixed deposits made with Shahibaug Entrepreneurs P. Ltd. covered u/s. 13 (2)(a) of the Act and therefore, the assessee's claim for exemption u/s. 11 of the I.T. Act, 1961 was
not affected."
2.�The questions referred are covered by the decision rendered by this Court today in Income Tax Reference No. 161 of 1984, and therefore, the questions are required to be answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. Accordingly we answer the questions with no order as to costs.
*********
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.