Case LawHigh Court › Itr/376/1984 Of Commissioner Of Income -...

Itr/376/1984 Of Commissioner Of Income -Tax v. Bakubhai Mansukhbhai Charity Trust

High Court 26 Jul 1996 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Itr/376/1984 Of Commissioner Of Income -Tax v. Bakubhai Mansukhbhai Charity Trust
Date of order
26 Jul 1996
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itr/376/1984 Of Commissioner Of Income -Tax v. Bakubhai Mansukhbhai Charity Trust, the High Court (1996) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 376 OF 1984 For Approval of Signature : Hon'ble MR. JUSTICE B.C. PATEL and Sd/- �MR. JUSTICE R.R. JAIN�Sd/- --------------------------------------------------------- 1.�Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed �to see the judgments ? No 2. To be referred to the Report or not ? No 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? No 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any Order made thereunder ? No 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge ? No --------------------------------------------------------- Appearance : Mr B.J. Shelat for M/s R.P Bhatt & Co., for the Applicant. Mr D.A. Mehta, Mr R.K. Patel and Mr B.D. Karia, Advocates for the Respondent. --------------------------------------------------------- Coram : B.C. Patel & R.R. Jain, JJ. Date of Decision : 26th July, 1996 Oral Judgment : (Per B.C. Patel, J.) �The Tribunal has referred the following questions for opinion of this Court. "1.�Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee was entitled to claim exemption u/s. 11 of the I.T. Act, 1961 in respect of the contribution of Rs. 80,000/- made to Nirmala Bakubhai Foundation ?" 2.�Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the interest received by the assessee on fixed deposits made with Shahibaug Entrepreneurs P. Ltd. covered u/s. 13 (2)(a) of the Act and therefore, the assessee's claim for exemption u/s. 11 of the I.T. Act, 1961 was not affected." 2.�The questions referred are covered by the decision rendered by this Court today in Income Tax Reference No. 161 of 1984, and therefore, the questions are required to be answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. Accordingly we answer the questions with no order as to costs. *********
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan