In Itr/4/2003 Of M/S Bareau Varitas v. Commissioner Of Income- Tax,Mumbai-City-Xii, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: 2In view of that, the reference is disposed of and returned unanswered.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.4 OF 2003
M/S.BUREAU VERITAS
)...APPLICANT
V/s.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX MUMBAI )CITY – XII, MUMBAI
)...RESPONDENT
Mr.Ashok Patil, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.P.C.Chhotaray, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM:S.V.GANGAPURWALA &A. M. BADAR, JJ.DATE:10[th] JULY 2017
P.C. :
1The learned counsel for the assessee submits that the reference is at behest of the assessee. The learned counsel submits that he has been instructed not to press the present reference.
2In view of that, the reference is disposed of and returned unanswered.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
(S.V.GANGAPURWALA), J.)
avk 1/1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue