Itr/4/2003 Of M/S.tropical Plantations,Kottayam v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tvm
High Court
24 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Itr/4/2003 Of M/S.tropical Plantations,Kottayam v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tvm
Date of order
24 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itr/4/2003 Of M/S.tropical Plantations,Kottayam v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tvm, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
TUESDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2008 / 3RD ASHADHA 1930
ITR.No. 4 of 2003()
-------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER IN RA.263/COCH/1998 IN
ITA.650/COCH/1994 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPLICANT:
-----------
MS/.TROPICAL PLANTATIONS LTD.,
KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV. SRI.JOHN RAMESH K.I.JOHN
RESPONDENTS:
-------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON(SR.),SR.COUNSEL FOR IT FOR R
SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT FOR R
THIS TAX REFERENCE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 24/06/2008, THE COURT ON 24/06/2008 DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K.MOHANAN, JJ.
....................................................................
I.T.R. No.4 of 2003
....................................................................Dated this the 24th day of June, 2008.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
In view of the small amount of tax involved, applicant is not pressingthe reference. We, therefore, close the I.T.R. by declining to answer thequestions referred.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
pms
V.K.MOHANANJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue