Itr/52/1989 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Cadila Chemicals Pvt Ltd
High Court
18 Jul 2002 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Itr/52/1989 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Cadila Chemicals Pvt Ltd
Date of order
18 Jul 2002
Assessment year(s)
1983-84
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itr/52/1989 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Cadila Chemicals Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2002) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? @ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXVersus CADILA CHEMICALS PVT LTD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 52 of 1989
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? @ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXVersus CADILA CHEMICALS PVT LTD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 52 of 1989 MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner No. 1 .......... for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ
Date of decision: 18/07/2002
(Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH)
�In this reference at the instance of the revenue,
the following question is referred for our opinion in
respect of assessment year 1983-84:-
"Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law
and on facts in holding the export cash
assistance of Rs.52,588/- received by the
assessee was a capital receipt not liable to
tax?"
2.�We have heard Mr MR Bhatt, learned Sr. Standing
Counsel for the revenue. Though served, none appears for
the respondent- assessee.
3.�Our attention is invited to the provisions of
section 28(iiib) of the Act, which read as under:-
28.�The following income shall be chargeable
to income-tax under the head Profits and gains of
business or profession",-
.....�......��...�......
�[(iiib)] cash assistance (by whatever name
called) received or receivable by
any person against exports under
any scheme of the Government of
India;]
�......�....�......�......�.......
�This clause was inserted by Finance Act, 1990
w.e.f. 1-4-1967. It is thus clear that cash assistance (by whatever name called) received or receivable by any person against exports under any scheme of the Government of India shall be chargeable to income tax under the head 'profits and gains of business or profession' under the aforesaid statutory provision. The export cash assistance of Rs.52,588/- received by the assessee was under such export promotion scheme. Hence, the same was clearly a revenue income.
4.�The same view has been taken by this Court in ITR No.133 of 1989 decided on 24-6-2002.
�Accordingly, our answer to the question referred
to us is in the negative i.e. in favour of the revenue
and against the assessee.
5.�The Reference accordingly stands disposed of with
no order as to costs.
���(M.S. Shah,J)�(K.A. Puj,J)
zgs/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.