Itr/52/1998 Of Trisun Chemical Ind.p.ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 52 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Sd/- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED Sd/- ========================================================= 1[Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed ]to see the judgment ? NOto see the judgment ? NO 2To be referred to the Reporter or not ? NO 3[Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy ]of the judgment ? NOof the judgment ? NO Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the of law as to the interpretation of the 4constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? NOconstitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? NO 5[Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ]? NO? NO ========================================================= TRISUN CHEMICAL IND.P.LTD. - Applicant(s)Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MRS SWATI SOPARKARfor Applicant(s) : 1,MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent(s) : 1, ========================================================= CORAM :HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTAand HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED Date : 22/04/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA) 1 Mrs. Swati Soparkar, learned Advocate has filed a note for withdrawal of the name of the Advocate stating therein that she has not filed Vakalatnama, and furthermore having tried to contact the assessee-applicant there is no response. 2In the circumstances, the name of the learned Advocate be deleted in absence of any Vakalatnama on record. 3The Reference is of 1998. Despite service there is no appearance, nor has any Paper book been filed by the assessee-applicant. In the circumstances, the Reference is returned unanswered for want of prosecution and stands disposed of accordingly. (D.A.Mehta, J.) Sd/- (Z.K.Saiyed, J.) M.M.BHATT