Case LawHigh Court › Itr/53/2000 Of Shri Dhirajlal H. Ambani...

Itr/53/2000 Of Shri Dhirajlal H. Ambani v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 02 Sep 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itr/53/2000 Of Shri Dhirajlal H. Ambani v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
02 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
1985-86
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itr/53/2000 Of Shri Dhirajlal H. Ambani v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: 4.The Reference is disposed of in the above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 53 OF 2000 Dhirajlal H. Ambani (HUF) .. Applicant v/s. The Commissioner of Income Tax.. Respondent Mr. P.C. Tripathi i/b Raj Darak for the applicant Mr. Ashok Kotangle a/w Ms. Padma Divakar for the respondent P.C. CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & S.C. GUPTE, J.J. DATED : 2[nd] SEPTEMBER, 2016. 1.This Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal relates to Assessment Year 1985-86. 2.Mr. Tripathi, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant assessee, at whose instance this Reference has been made by the Tribunal, states on instructions that the applicant assessee is not interested in pursuing the present Reference. 3.In the above view, the Reference is returned unanswered. However, it is made clear that the questions raised herein for our opinion are left open for consideration in an appropriate case, if not already decided. 4.The Reference is disposed of in the above terms. No order as to costs. (S.C. GUPTE, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan