Itr/62/1993 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Arvind Jewellers
High Court
06 Jul 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Itr/62/1993 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Arvind Jewellers
Date of order
06 Jul 2005
Assessment year(s)
1981-82
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itr/62/1993 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Arvind Jewellers, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Decision: 1.Reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as tocosts. /patil (H.N.DEVANI, J.)
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 62 of 1993
For Approval and Signature:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTAHON'BLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI
=========================================================
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - Petitioner(s)
VersusARVIND JEWELLERS, - Respondent(s)
=========================================================
Appearance :
MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner No(s).: 1.
MR RK PATEL for Respondent No(s).: 1.
=======================================================
CORAM :HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTAHON'BLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI
Date : 06/07/2005
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA)
1.Following question has been referred by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'C' under Section 256(2) of the IncomeTax Act, 1961, at the instance Commissioner of Income Tax.
1.The Assessment Year is 1982-83. The only issue involved iswhether the assessee was entitled to renewal of registration. Itis common ground between the parties that the facts obtaining inthis year are identical to those obtaining in Assessment Year1981-82 in assessee's own case, and hence, it is not necessary toset out the facts and contentions in detail.
1.As can be seen from the impugned order of Tribunal, which ischallenged, the Tribunal has followed its own order forAssessment Year 1981-82 without assigning any independentreasons. In these circumstances, for the reasons stated injudgment rendered by this Court today in Income Tax ReferenceNo.173/1989, the question is answered in the affirmative i.e. infavour of the assessee and against the revenue.
1.Reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as tocosts.
/patil
(H.N.DEVANI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.