Case LawHigh Court › Itr v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Itr v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 22 Sep 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Itr v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
22 Sep 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itr v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Issue: 5 [Whether it is to be circulated to the ]civil judge ? ===================================================== SURAT DIST.

Decision: The reference stands disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No.75 of 1994 For Approval and Signature:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Sd/- HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI Sd/- ===================================================== 1 [Whether Reporters of Local Papers may ]be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 [To be referred to the Reporter or not ]? 3 [Whether their Lordships wish to see ] the fair copy of the judgment ? Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the 4interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 [Whether it is to be circulated to the ]civil judge ? ===================================================== SURAT DIST. CO.OP. SPINNING MILLS LTD. - Applicant(s)Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX - Respondent(s) ===================================================== Appearance :SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for Applicant(s) : 1,MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent(s) : 1, ===================================================== CORAM :HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA and HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI Date : 22/09/2005 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA) ITR/75/1994 2/2JUDGMENT This is a reference at the instance of the assessee. Though served by R.P.A.D., the applicant-assessee has failed to put in appearance or file the necessary paper-book in compliance with the Rules of the High Court. In the circumstances, the reference is returned unanswered for want of prosecution. The reference stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- Sd/- [ H.N. DEVANI, J ] *** Bhavesh*
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan