Itr/899/1998 Of M/S. Vulcan Lavae Ltd v. The Commisioner Of Incometax
High Court
19 Jul 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itr/899/1998 Of M/S. Vulcan Lavae Ltd v. The Commisioner Of Incometax
Date of order
19 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
1973-74
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itr/899/1998 Of M/S. Vulcan Lavae Ltd v. The Commisioner Of Incometax, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: 4.The Reference is disposed of in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 899 OF 1998
M/s. Vulcan Laval Ltd.
.. Applicant
v/s.
The Commissioner of Income TaxBombay
.. Respondent
Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar for the applicant None for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J.
DATED : 19[th] JULY, 2016.
P.C.
1.This Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) relates to Assessment Year 1973-74.
2.Mr. Naniwadekar, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant assessee in support of the Reference, on instructions, states that the papers and proceedings relating to the present Reference are not available and in that view the Reference is not being pressed.
3.The question posed for our opinion at the instance of the
applicant assessee are not being pressed. In the above view, the
Reference is being returned unanswered. The questions as framed for
our opinion are left open to be considered in an appropriate case, if not already decided.
4.The Reference is disposed of in the above terms.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.