In Itta v. Agriculture Marketcommittee[[1, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Recording the submission, the appeal is dismissed at the stageof admission. _________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 16[th] October, 2012 GRR _______________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J [1](2011) 336 ITR 641 (AP)
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
ITTA No. 422 of 2012
Dated: 16-10-2012
Between:
Commissioner of Income TaxRajahmundry
And
Agricultural Market Committee,Chintalapudi.
…Appellant
…Respondent.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
ITTA No. 422 of 2012
Judgment(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
It is represented by Sri S.R.Ashok, learned Senior Counsel forthe Income Tax-the appellant that this appeal preferred against theorder of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Benchdated 4-4-2008 in ITA No. 256/Vizag/07 requires to be dismissed andthe order of the Tribunal confirmed in view of the judgment of this Courtreported in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Agriculture MarketCommittee[[1]].
Recording the submission, the appeal is dismissed at the stageof admission.
_________________________
GODA RAGHURAM, J
16[th] October, 2012
GRR
_______________________________
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
[1](2011) 336 ITR 641 (AP)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue