I.t.t.a v. Agricultural Market Committee[[1]] ~~.~~
High Court
12 Dec 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
I.t.t.a v. Agricultural Market Committee[[1]] ~~.~~
Date of order
12 Dec 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In I.t.t.a v. Agricultural Market Committee[[1]] ~~.~~, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Accordingly and in the light of the judgment of this Court inCommissioner of Income-Tax (supra), the appeal is dismissed andthe order of the Tribunal dated 29.04.2008 is confirmed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
I.T.T.A No.558 of 2012
Date: 12.12.2012
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Tirupati.
Agricultural Market Committee,Siddavatam, Kadapa District.
AND
… Appellant
… Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
I.T.T.A. No.558 of 2012
JUDGMENT (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram):
This appeal by the Revenue preferred under Section 260-A ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, dated 29.04.2008 inI.T.A.No.321/Hyd/2008, requires to be dismissed in the light of thejudgment of this Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax v.Agricultural Market Committee[[1]].
Sri S.R. Ashok, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for theappellant concedes the legal position.
Accordingly and in the light of the judgment of this Court inCommissioner of Income-Tax (supra), the appeal is dismissed andthe order of the Tribunal dated 29.04.2008 is confirmed. No costs.
JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
Date: 12.12.2012
JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
va
[1](2011) 336 ITR 641 (AP)
Date: 12.12.2012
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue