Case LawHigh Court › Itta/102/2002 Of Infotech Enter Ltd, Hyd...

Itta/102/2002 Of Infotech Enter Ltd, Hyderabad v. Joint Comm Of Income Tax Hyd

High Court 10 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/102/2002 Of Infotech Enter Ltd, Hyderabad v. Joint Comm Of Income Tax Hyd
Date of order
10 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itta/102/2002 Of Infotech Enter Ltd, Hyderabad v. Joint Comm Of Income Tax Hyd, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant hasapplied for setllement under'Vivad se Vishwas' scheme and, therefore, asrequired under the scheme, appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal 4. ln vierv of the above, appeal is disposed of on withdrawal 5. lnterlocutory applications pending, i...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA INCOME TAX TRIBUNA L APPEAL NO: 102 OF 2002 against lncome the order dated tax Tribunal 31-05-2002 Appeal under section 260-A in lrA.No. 51lHydl2}o2 of the on lncome the file of the tax Act lncome1961 ,Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad he Assessment year 1998-99, preferred against the order dated 17-11-2001 in Appeat.No. 428/JCR.2/C|T(A)Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad he Assessment year 1998-99, preferred against the order dated 17-11-2001 in Appeat.No. 428/JCR.2/C|T(A)lll/00-01 on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals lll), HyderabadAddl CITSR, preferred against the order Hyderabad.dated in GIR 171 on the file of the lncome tax officer , wardAddl CITSR, preferred against the order Hyderabad.dated in GIR 171 on the file of the lncome tax officer , ward coMMoN cT rN |TTA NO.102/2002 AND CMp 21197/2002 Between: lnfotech Enterprises Limited, Hyderabad., represented by its whole time Director,Smt B.Suchitra.Smt B.Suchitra. ...PET|TiONER/APPELLANT AND The Joint Commissioner of lncome Tax, Range-ll, Aayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh,Hyderabad-1 ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT cMP 21197 0F 2002: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operationof the Order in ITA Nos. 51lHydl2002 for the Asst.Year 1998-99 dt 31.05.2002 onthe affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operationof the Order in ITA Nos. 51lHydl2002 for the Asst.Year 1998-99 dt 31.05.2002 onthe file of lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench-B and pass such otherorder or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit.order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI B. NARASIMHA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondents: K MAMATA CHOWDARY The Court made the following: ORDER l To, THE rlON'BLE SRI JUSTICE [U] ITTA.NO .102 0F 2002 C)RDE R tPer the lton'ble [Sri][ Justice ][Uiial ][B] Heard learned counsel for the [parties] 2. This is an appeal under Section 260 A of [the ][lncome Tax ][Act,]1961 filed by the assessee against the order dated 31.05.2002 [passed ][by]the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad [Bench ]-'B' [in]l.T.A. NO.5 1 /Hy d,'2002 lor the assessment year [1 ]998-99 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant hasapplied for setllement under'Vivad se Vishwas' scheme and, therefore, asrequired under the scheme, appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal 4. ln vierv of the above, appeal is disposed of on withdrawal 5. lnterlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs SD/. K.SRINIVAS JOINT REGISTRAReibSECTION OFFICER ,TRUE COPY// 1.The Chairman, lncome Tax [Appellate Tribunal, Bench ]['B', ][Hyderabad] 1 . The Commissioner of lncome [Tax Appellate ][lll, ][Hyderabad] 2. The lncome Tax Officer [(Appeal) ward, ][Addl' ][CITSR, ][Hyderabad.] 3 One CC to SRI B. Naasimha [Sarma, Advocate ] 4. One CC to K. fr4amatha Chowdary, [Advocate ] 5. Two CD Copies plp t\,tl. I HIGH COURT DATED:1 011112021 ORDERITTA.No.102 of 2OO2 DISPOSING ITTA AS WITHDRAWN \ [-L\]1t\s 1t.e [SIa]14o^e{J9c(,22 [N0v'041]c)\+,\oj!:C6:.Sh'.. I(-l
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan