Case LawHigh Court › Itta/102/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/102/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dr. T.ravi Kumar

High Court 24 Jul 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/102/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dr. T.ravi Kumar
Date of order
24 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/102/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dr. T.ravi Kumar, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 402 of 2011 will follow in this matter The appeal is accordingly dismissed. _________________ K.J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C BHANU I.T.T.A. No. 102 of 2012 DATED: 24.7.2013 Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad. … Appellant AndDr. T. Ravi Kumar,Nellore. … Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C BHANU I.T.T.A. No.102 of 2012 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) In view of the judgment rendered by us today inI.T.T.A. No. 402 of 2011, we do not want to writeseparate judgment in this appeal and we follow thesame judgment, as the issue in fact and law isidentical. also. Therefore, the judgment rendered in I.T.T.A. No. 402 of 2011 will follow in this matter The appeal is accordingly dismissed. _________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ ______________ K.C. BHANU, J 24.07.2013 pnb
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan