Itta/103/2002 Of Infotech Enterprises Ltd., Hyd v. Jt.commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyd-1
High Court
10 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/103/2002 Of Infotech Enterprises Ltd., Hyd v. Jt.commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyd-1
Date of order
10 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
1997-98
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itta/103/2002 Of Infotech Enterprises Ltd., Hyd v. Jt.commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyd-1, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant hasapplied for settlement under'Vivad se Vishwas'scheme and, therefore. asrequired under the scheme, appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal 4. ln view of the above, appeal is disposed of on withdrawal 5. lnterlocutory applications pending, if...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 103 oF 2002
against lncome the order tax dated Tribunal Appeal under section 260-A 31-05-2002 in lrA.No. 10312002 on the file of the lncome of the tax lncome Act 1961 Tax,Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad the Assessment year 1997-98,Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad the Assessment year 1997-98,preferred against the order dated 4-08-2000 in Appeal.No. 94toc-7(4)2lclr(A)tv/2ooo-01 on the file of the commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals lV), Hyderabad preferredagainst the order dated in GIR 1-71lDclr 7(4), Hyderabad on the file of the lncome tax(Deputy Commissionr of lncome Tax)Officer, (ward Circle 7(4), Hyderabad.against the order dated in GIR 1-71lDclr 7(4), Hyderabad on the file of the lncome tax(Deputy Commissionr of lncome Tax)Officer, (ward Circle 7(4), Hyderabad.
COMMOCT IN ITTA NO.1O3/2002 AND CMP 2',t198t2002
Between:
!fo]gc! [Enterprises Limited, Hyderabad., represented ][by its ][whole ][time ][Director,]Smt B-Suchitra.
...PET|T|ONERyAPPELLANT
AND
The Joint Commissioner of lncome Tax, Range-ll, Aayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh,Hyderabad-1
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
CMP NO: 21198 OF 2002
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operationof the order in lrA Nos. 61l{l20o0 for the Asst.Year 1997-98 dt 31.05.2002 on thefile of lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench-B and pass such otherorder or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit.
Counsel for the Appellant:SRl B.NARASIMHA SARMA, ADVOCATE
Counsel for the Respondents: K MAMATA CHOWDARY, ADVOCATE
The Court made the following: ORDER
\
THE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
|TTA.NO.103 0F 2002
O R D E R {Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice Uiial Bhuvan)
Heard learned counsel for the parties
2. This is an appeal under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act,1961 filed by the assessee against the order dated 31.05.2002 passed bythe lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench -'B' inl.T.A NO 610/H12000 lor the assessment year 1997-98
3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant hasapplied for settlement under'Vivad se Vishwas'scheme and, therefore. asrequired under the scheme, appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal
4. ln view of the above, appeal is disposed of on withdrawal
5. lnterlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No
order as to costs.
SD/.M. SHANTHI VARDHANIJOINT REGISTRARGSECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
1.The Chairman, lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench [,8,, ]Hyderabad.
1. The Commissioner of lncome Tax Appeals tV. HvderabaO.'
2. The D^eputy_Commrssioner.qf
! 1c9mb 1c9mb [[Tax, Ciictd 7(+) ][Hydera ][bad.]][[Hydera ][bad.]]
! 1c9mb 1c9mb [[Tax, Ciictd 7(+) ][Hydera ][bad.]][[Hydera ][bad.]]3. one CC ro SRt B. NARASTMHA SARMA, Advocatd tbpi.rC--t----4. One CC to K. MAMATA CHOWDARy,Advocate tOiUCf [-']5. Two CD Copies
plp\"
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 011112A2'l
ORDER
ITTA.No.103 of 2002
DISMISSING THE ITTA ASWITHDRAWNWITHDRAWN
P1@\
1$E!Iatco2 2 [i{1v20?l]o*S P[a]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.