Case LawHigh Court › Itta/106/2008 Of Qualithy Care India Lim...

Itta/106/2008 Of Qualithy Care India Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 20 Jun 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/106/2008 Of Qualithy Care India Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
20 Jun 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/106/2008 Of Qualithy Care India Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accorrlingly, this appeal is dismissed having renderedinfmctuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYI}ERABAOTHURSDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAULANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU INCO ME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: [106 OF 2008] lncome tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-A of the [lncome ][tax ][Act, ][1961 ],against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, [Hyderabad ][Bench ]["A"]Hyderabad'in ITA No. 593 / Hyd/ 2002 fot Assessmenl [Year ][1998-99 ][dated ][28-]-09-2007 preferred against the order of the [Commissioner ][of lncome ][Tax (Appeals ]lll ), Hyderabad dated 28-03-2002 in ITA No. 665/Tr. [SR-l/ CIT ][(A) ]-llllol-O2preferred against the order of the Additional Commissioner of lncome [Tax ( ][Assts/)]Special Range-|, Hyderabad dated 22-03-2001 [in ] [No. ][A-128.] Between: Quality Care lndia Limited, 5-04-199. [N.N.Road, rep.by Chairiman ][and ][Managing]Director ...APPELLANT AND Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax , Circle 2 [4] lT [Towers, AC Guards,]Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: SRI M. SRIDHAR, REPRESENTING [SRl. ] GUNARANJAN Counsel for the Respondent: SRI VIJHAY K PUNNA [(SENIOR SC ] [l.T] DEPr.,) The Court delivered the following Judgment: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAULANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NA"TIAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.1O6 o 20()8 JUDGMENT: p er llon'bte Si Justice Sujog pau\ Sri I\{.Sridhar, learned counsel representing Sri ChallaGunaranjtrn, learned counsel for the appella-nt, filed a memoalon[ with document to submit that the dispute between theparties stood resolved alld the appeal has rendered infructuous. 2. Sri VUhay K Punna, learned Senior Standing Counselappears for the lncome Tax Department. 3. The prayer is allowed_ 4. Accorrlingly, this appeal is dismissed having renderedinfmctuous. The question of law will remain be open to bedecided in appropriate case. No costs. Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also stand close d sd,- [s ][cH'SArtJrEREAvJ] ,1sECTloN [brrtcen] //TRUE [COPY"] To The [[lncome ]][Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad Bench "A" Hyderabad] 1.The [[lncome ]]2.The [Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax (Appeals ][- ][lll ][)' ][Hyderabad]3.The Additional [Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax ][( ][Assts/) Special Range-l']Hyderabad2.The [Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax (Appeals ][- ][lll ][)' ][Hyderabad]3.The Additional [Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax ][( ][Assts/) Special Range-l']Hyderabad4.ONE [tO ][SRI, CHALLA GUNARANJAN ][AdVOCAIC ][tOPUCl]5.One [to ] [(SENIOR ] [ITDEPT'' ][) ][toPUCl]5.One [to ] [(SENIOR ] [ITDEPT'' ][) ][toPUCl] 6. [Two ][CD CoPies] kur [cl.(L] l l I III IIIi I I i I I i I l I HIGH COURT DATED:2O10612024 JTJDCVI EN't|TTA.No.106 [of ][2008] I)ISTIISSI\(; I'tTA @r,*[,V a(of ft,: ",..,......,,qJ(oo0 0 ,ttti [zlzs]*,/Dp,ar,,, TC,, [-,.]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan