Itta/109/2001 Of Commr. Incometax Ap-I Hyd v. M/S.nagarjuna Food Products (P) Ltd. Hyd
High Court
26 Nov 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/109/2001 Of Commr. Incometax Ap-I Hyd v. M/S.nagarjuna Food Products (P) Ltd. Hyd
Date of order
26 Nov 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/109/2001 Of Commr. Incometax Ap-I Hyd v. M/S.nagarjuna Food Products (P) Ltd. Hyd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2) years, the present appeal is also liable to be dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
I.T.T.APPEAL No.109 OF 2001
JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Challa Kodanda Ram)
It is submitted by both the counsel that the connectedI.T.T.A.Nos.108 of 2001 and 20 of 2002 filed raising the similarquestion of law covered in this appeal, were dismissed by a DivisionBench of this Court vide its common order dated 03.02.2012 on theground that the tax effect in the cases was below Rs.1,00,000/-.
2) years, the present appeal is also liable to be dismissed.
In view of the dismissal of the appeals for the earlier
3) Accordingly, the I.T.T. Appeal is dismissed. No order asto costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this I.T.T.A. shallstand disposed of.
______________________
G. CHANDRAIAH,J
____________________________
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
Date:26.11.2013.
Gk.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH
Gk.
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
I.T.T.APPEAL No.109 OF 2001
Date:26.11.2013.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.