Case Law › High Court › Itta/110/2001 Of Commissioner Of Incomet...

Itta/110/2001 Of Commissioner Of Incometax Vizag v. Ms Vensa Biotek Ltd. Samalkot

High Court 26 Nov 2013 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

26 Nov 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/110/2001 Of Commissioner Of Incometax Vizag v. Ms Vensa Biotek Ltd. Samalkot, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.APPEAL No.110 OF 2001 JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Challa Kodanda Ram) Learned counsel appearing for the respondent would submitthat the total tax effect in the present appeal is Rs.85,251/- only. 2) It is not in dispute that a Division Bench of this Court in earlieroccasions refused to entertain the appeals where the tax effection isless than Rs.1,00,000/- following the circular of the Central Board ofDirect Taxes. 3) Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the appeal isdismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any,pending in this I.T.T.A. shall stand disposed of. ______________________ G. CHANDRAIAH,J ____________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J Date:26.11.2013. Gk. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH Gk. AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.APPEAL No.110 OF 2001 Date:26.11.2013.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.