Case LawHigh Court › Itta/111/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/111/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ongole Educational Academy Pvt Ltd

High Court 25 Feb 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/111/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ongole Educational Academy Pvt Ltd
Date of order
25 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/111/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ongole Educational Academy Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,the Tribunal is correct in law in setting aside the order of theCommissioner of Income Tax passed under Section 263 of theAct?” We have heard Mr.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed. ___________________K.J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No. 111 of 2014 Date: 25.02.2014 Between: The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV,Hyderabad. … Appellant And M/s. Ongole Educational Academy Pvt., Ltd.,Hyderabad. … Respondents This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No. 111 of 2014 JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) This appeal is sought to be preferred against the judgment andorder of the learned Tribunal dated 22.06.2007 in relation to assessmentyear 1998-99 and sought to be admitted on the following suggestedquestions of law: “1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case theorder of the Tribunal is perverse? 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,the Tribunal is correct in law in setting aside the order of theCommissioner of Income Tax passed under Section 263 of theAct?” We have heard Mr. Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant,and gone through the judgment and order of the learned Tribunal. The learned Tribunal has recorded on fact that Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals) failed to establish as to how the order of theAssessing Officer is erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of theRevenue particularly when the Assessing Officer passed theassessment order after considering and examining all the details filed bythe assessee. It is pre-condition that the order must be erroneous andprejudicial to the interests of the Revenue to exercise jurisdiction underSection 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961. If this factual condition is missing, the entire exercise of jurisdiction will be futile. Therefore, we do not findany reason to interfere with impugned judgment and order, as theTribunal has come to the correct conclusion. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. ___________________K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ Date: 25.02.2014ES ___________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan