Case LawHigh Court › Itta/11/2024 Of Deepak Nagori v. Income...

Itta/11/2024 Of Deepak Nagori v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 21 Jan 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/11/2024 Of Deepak Nagori v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
21 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/11/2024 Of Deepak Nagori v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Prayer [is ][allowed.] In the result, the [appeal ][is ][dismissed ][as ][withd'rawn' ][No] D order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SR! JUSTICE SUJOY PAULANDTHE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 11 OF 2024 Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the lncome Tax Act, 196i against theOrder dated 12-12-2023 passed in l.T.A.No. 1713lHydl2O18 for Assessment year2012-13 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Hyderabadpreferred against the Order dated 28-05-2018 passed in Appeal No. ITANo.105'16/2016-17 on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-2,Hyderabad preterred against the Assessment Order dated 28-12-2017 passed inPAN/GIR No. ABSPN3300M on the file of the lncome Tax Officer, Ward-8(3),Hyderabad. Between: Deepak Nagori, 5LH 1501, Lanco Hills, Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad 500089 ...Appellant AND lncome Tax Officer, Ward 8(3), Signature Towers, Opp. Botanical Gardens,Kondapur, Hyderabad-500081 ...Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court may be [pleased ]tostay the collection of tax and the consequent [penalty proceedings ]and all furtheractions arising out of the assessment order dated 28-12-2017. Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri M Naga Deepak Counsel for the Respondent [': ] - - - The Court delivered the following Judgment : THE HONOURABLE ANDTHE HONOURABLE [DT. ] [G. ] I.T.T.A. No.LL of 2024 (per Hon'ble SP,J) JIIDGMENT: Mr.M. Naga [Deepak, ][learned counsel ][for ][the ][appellant ][filed] a memo dated [17.01.2025 ][seeking ][permission ][to ][withdravf ][the]appeal. 2. Prayer [is ][allowed.] In the result, the [appeal ][is ][dismissed ][as ][withd'rawn' ][No] D order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous [applications ][pending ][in ][this] appeal, if anv, [shall ][stand ][closed.] Sd/. C,V. MALLIKARJUNA JOTNT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// /SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The lncome [Tax ][Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Hyderabad] 2. The Commissioner [of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Hyderabad] 3. The lncome [Tax Officer, Ward-B(3), ][Hyderabad] 4. One CC to Sri M Naga [Deepak, Advocate ]IOPUCI 5. Two CD [CoPies;] VA/ho. i I I ,iII HIGH GOURT DATED:21 10112025 irtrrE 6-(o'qC30 J.,i ;i125ot.OS.! [pATcH][ ,--c] JUDGMENTlTTA.No.11 o12024 DISMISSING THE \,{
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan