Itta/11/2024 Of Deepak Nagori v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
21 Jan 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/11/2024 Of Deepak Nagori v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
21 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/11/2024 Of Deepak Nagori v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Prayer [is ][allowed.] In the result, the [appeal ][is ][dismissed ][as ][withd'rawn' ][No] D order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SR! JUSTICE SUJOY PAULANDTHE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 11 OF 2024
Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the lncome Tax Act, 196i against theOrder dated 12-12-2023 passed in l.T.A.No. 1713lHydl2O18 for Assessment year2012-13 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Hyderabadpreferred against the Order dated 28-05-2018 passed in Appeal No. ITANo.105'16/2016-17 on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-2,Hyderabad preterred against the Assessment Order dated 28-12-2017 passed inPAN/GIR No. ABSPN3300M on the file of the lncome Tax Officer, Ward-8(3),Hyderabad.
Between:
Deepak Nagori, 5LH 1501, Lanco Hills, Chitrapuri Colony, Hyderabad 500089
...Appellant
AND
lncome Tax Officer, Ward 8(3), Signature Towers, Opp. Botanical Gardens,Kondapur, Hyderabad-500081
...Respondent
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court may be [pleased ]tostay the collection of tax and the consequent [penalty proceedings ]and all furtheractions arising out of the assessment order dated 28-12-2017.
Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri M Naga Deepak
Counsel for the Respondent [': ]
- - -
The Court delivered the following Judgment :
THE HONOURABLE ANDTHE HONOURABLE [DT. ] [G. ]
I.T.T.A. No.LL of 2024
(per Hon'ble SP,J)
JIIDGMENT:
Mr.M. Naga [Deepak, ][learned counsel ][for ][the ][appellant ][filed]
a memo dated [17.01.2025 ][seeking ][permission ][to ][withdravf ][the]appeal.
2. Prayer [is ][allowed.]
In the result, the [appeal ][is ][dismissed ][as ][withd'rawn' ][No]
D
order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous [applications ][pending ][in ][this]
appeal, if anv, [shall ][stand ][closed.]
Sd/. C,V. MALLIKARJUNA JOTNT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
/SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The lncome [Tax ][Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Hyderabad]
2. The Commissioner [of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Hyderabad]
3. The lncome [Tax Officer, Ward-B(3), ][Hyderabad]
4. One CC to Sri M Naga [Deepak, Advocate ]IOPUCI
5. Two CD [CoPies;]
VA/ho.
i
I
I
,iII
HIGH GOURT
DATED:21 10112025
irtrrE 6-(o'qC30 J.,i ;i125ot.OS.! [pATcH][ ,--c]
JUDGMENTlTTA.No.11 o12024
DISMISSING THE
\,{
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.