Case LawHigh Court › Itta/112/2001 Of Commissioner Of Incomet...

Itta/112/2001 Of Commissioner Of Incometax Hyd v. Bharat Rice And Oil Mills

High Court 26 Nov 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/112/2001 Of Commissioner Of Incometax Hyd v. Bharat Rice And Oil Mills
Date of order
26 Nov 2013
Assessment year(s)
1992-93, 1991-92
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/112/2001 Of Commissioner Of Incometax Hyd v. Bharat Rice And Oil Mills, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Since thequestions raised in the present appeal are squarely covered by thejudgment dated 03.07.2013 of a Division Bench of this Court inI.T.T.A.No.34 of 2001, following the judgment in I.T.T.A.No.34 of 2001,this appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.APPEAL No.112 OF 2001 JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Challa Kodanda Ram) The present appeal is filed by the Income Tax Departmentraising the questions of law relating to the assessment year 1992-93. 2) When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri S. SeshidharaReddy, learned counsel appearing for the Income Tax Department,would fairly submit that the questions involved in the present appealare similar to the questions raised in I.T.T.A.No.34 of 2001 in relationto assessment year 1991-92, wherein a Division Bench of this Courtaffirmed the order of the Tribunal and dismissed the said appeal. Copy of the order in I.T.T.A.No.34 of 2001 has been filed. Since thequestions raised in the present appeal are squarely covered by thejudgment dated 03.07.2013 of a Division Bench of this Court inI.T.T.A.No.34 of 2001, following the judgment in I.T.T.A.No.34 of 2001,this appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. MiscellaneousPetitions, if any, pending in this I.T.T.A. shall stand disposed of. 3) Let a copy of the judgment in I.T.T.A.No.34 of 2001 be tagged tothe copy of this judgment. ______________________ G. CHANDRAIAH,J ____________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J Date:26.11.2013. Gk. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.APPEAL No.112 OF 2001 Date:26.11.2013. Gk.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan